Refreshing and fresh. It's so cute.
It's an idol that looks like an idol. It is a created image. She wants to see what these girls usually look like.
Any work is created. Movies, dramas, AVs, novels... Of course. There is a mixture of "fact" and "fiction". Even the person himself doesn't know if this refreshing smile was created or real. Because there is always truth. But there are always lies. That is what is created.
It is human arrogance to try to depict "existence itself" and "essence".
If you improve your technique, you may be able to get closer to its essence. In Greek sculpture we see that quest for truth. We see it in painting from the Renaissance onwards. The writer finds another truth in his work. It is a truth different from the object that I wanted to draw (create). Abstract art is just that. A realistic work can be said to be a mere copy, forgery, counterfeit, or counterfeit.
Contemporary art criticism in Japan is an embodiment of Western thought since the modern era, so it differs from the original Japanese sense of values. It would be correct from a Western point of view to say that non-realistic Japanese paintings express the “essence of the subject” (a sense of the seasons, the vitality of trees, the sex appeal of women, etc.) Isn't it different from the previous values?