最近、太ってきたので糖尿病も心配になり、読んでみた。
糖質ダイエットは痩せるということなので、2.3日前から実践してる。
糖質ダイエットの理論は大体わかった。
人間の歴史のうち、農耕が始まるまでは、糖質をとることはまれだった。糖質は消化吸収されたあと、インスリンによって脂肪に変わり、飢餓に備える唯一のセーフティーネットとなっていた。
それが主食となり、デザートにもなった現在の食生活は生活習慣病の原因となっている。本来の人間の体は糖質制限食に適合している。
ただ、ある新しい理論を出すと、必ず反対の意見が出るものです。「糖質ダイエットは体に悪い」という説です。どちらもそれなりの理屈を付けるけど、どちらが正しいかは読者が判断するしかない。
だいたい「医者（治療）はいらない」とか「薬はいらない」などと書くと、製薬会社からお金をもらって反対意見の本を書く輩が必ず出てくる。
そのうち怪しい民間療法の本や、スピリチュアルな本も出てくる。終いには、糖質ダイエットのための砂糖ではない甘味料とか、糖質ダイエットの補助サプリなんかも出てくる始末。
情報は過剰になり、氾濫し、もともとの理論を覆い隠す。
糖質ダイエットが体にいいのか悪いのかはわからない。それでもしばらくは続けてみようと思う。今回読んだ江部康二氏の本は他に2冊。
⟨impressions⟩
Recently I became fat and worried about diabetes, so I read it.
Since carbohydrate diet is to lose weight, I practiced it for 2.3 days.
I understand the theory of carbohydrate diet.
Until the beginning of farming, carbohydrates were rare in human history. After carbohydrates were digested and absorbed, they were turned into fat by insulin, providing the only safety net in case of starvation.
The current dietary habits, where cereals have become a staple food and desserts, are causing lifestyle-related diseases. The natural human body is compatible with a carbohydrate-restricted diet.
However, when we come up with a new theory, we always get the opposite opinion. It is the theory that "a carbohydrate diet is bad for the body." Both give some reason, but the reader has to decide which is right.
If you write "I do not need a doctor (treatment)" or "I do not need any medicine", some people will get money from a pharmaceutical company and write a book of dissent.
Over time there will be some suspicious folk remedies and spiritual books. At the end, there will be sweeteners that are not sugar for sugar diet and supplements for sugar diet.
Information becomes excessive, floods and masks the original theory.
I don't know if a carbohydrate diet is good or bad. Nevertheless, I will continue for a while. I read two other books by Koji Ebe this time.
Recently I became fat and worried about diabetes, so I read it.
Since carbohydrate diet is to lose weight, I practiced it for 2.3 days.
I understand the theory of carbohydrate diet.
Until the beginning of farming, carbohydrates were rare in human history. After carbohydrates were digested and absorbed, they were turned into fat by insulin, providing the only safety net in case of starvation.
The current dietary habits, where cereals have become a staple food and desserts, are causing lifestyle-related diseases. The natural human body is compatible with a carbohydrate-restricted diet.
However, when we come up with a new theory, we always get the opposite opinion. It is the theory that "a carbohydrate diet is bad for the body." Both give some reason, but the reader has to decide which is right.
If you write "I do not need a doctor (treatment)" or "I do not need any medicine", some people will get money from a pharmaceutical company and write a book of dissent.
Over time there will be some suspicious folk remedies and spiritual books. At the end, there will be sweeteners that are not sugar for sugar diet and supplements for sugar diet.
Information becomes excessive, floods and masks the original theory.
I don't know if a carbohydrate diet is good or bad. Nevertheless, I will continue for a while. I read two other books by Koji Ebe this time.
[出演者(プロフィール)]
江部康二
1950年、京都府生まれ。京都市左京区・高雄病院理事長
[]
