難しくて、全くわからなかった。時間の無駄だった。
「pour Marx」は本当に「マルクスのために」なんだろうか。フランス語はわからないが、「マルクスについて」くらいの意味なのではないか。
確かに「経哲草稿」の発表は衝撃的であり、わたしにも多くの影響を与えた。前期マルクスを持って、後期マルクスをとらえ直す試みも、理解できる。誰もマルクスのように考えることができないのだから。
しかし、前期マルクスと後期マルクスの「断絶」を強調することは、必要な１つのステップではあるが、後期マルクスによって、前期マルクスをとらえ直す試みと同じく、次に必要なのは、前期・後期を通じて存在するマルクスの思想の中心点を探ることである。
しかし、それらも、マルクス個人を理解する上での必要であって、それ以上のことをマルクスの文献の中に探す必要はない。必要な言葉は、文章を書く人、話す人が、自分で作り出せばいいのだ。それができないのなら、マルクスからの引用文は何の価値もない。
重層的決定論は、実践としてグラムシの理論とつなげるとおもしろいかもしれない。しかし、それ自体は物事がいろいろな要因で決まると言っているだけである。
また、いつか読むかもしれないが、今のところ、この手の本は学者に任せておこう。
Sun Jun 23 14:46:09 2002
⟨impressions⟩
It was difficult and I didn't understand at all. It was a waste of time.
Is "pour Marx" really "for Marx"? I don't understand French, but I think it means something like "about Marx".
Certainly, the publication of the "Kyotetsu Draft" was shocking and had a lot of influence on me. I can understand the attempt to recapture the late Marx with the early Marx. No one can think like Marx.
However, emphasizing the "disconnection" between the early Marx and the late Marx is a necessary step, but as with the attempt by the late Marx to recapture the early Marx, the next need exists throughout the early and late stages. It is to explore the central point of Marx's thought.
However, they too are necessary for understanding Marx's individual, and there is no need to look further in Marx's literature. The necessary words can be created by the person who writes the text and the person who speaks. If you can't do that, the quote from Marx is of no value.
Multi-layered determinism may be interesting to connect with Gramsci's theory in practice. But in itself it just says that things are determined by a number of factors.
Also, I may read it someday, but for now, I'll leave this kind of book to scholars.
Sun Jun 23 14:46:09 2002
It was difficult and I didn't understand at all. It was a waste of time.
Is "pour Marx" really "for Marx"? I don't understand French, but I think it means something like "about Marx".
Certainly, the publication of the "Kyotetsu Draft" was shocking and had a lot of influence on me. I can understand the attempt to recapture the late Marx with the early Marx. No one can think like Marx.
However, emphasizing the "disconnection" between the early Marx and the late Marx is a necessary step, but as with the attempt by the late Marx to recapture the early Marx, the next need exists throughout the early and late stages. It is to explore the central point of Marx's thought.
However, they too are necessary for understanding Marx's individual, and there is no need to look further in Marx's literature. The necessary words can be created by the person who writes the text and the person who speaks. If you can't do that, the quote from Marx is of no value.
Multi-layered determinism may be interesting to connect with Gramsci's theory in practice. But in itself it just says that things are determined by a number of factors.
Also, I may read it someday, but for now, I'll leave this kind of book to scholars.
Sun Jun 23 14:46:09 2002
90年代を先導することになる1960年代という時代状況のなかで書かれたものであり、政治的にも理論的にもマルクス主義の解体の危機が迫っていることをいち早く予感した哲学者がのこした遺言の書。
独自の方法的読解によるマルクス主義理論の新しい理解をもって、〈構造主義〉以降の思想の領域を大きく方向づけたアルチュセールの主著。旧訳『甦るマルクス』を全面的に改訳し、未発表論文1篇を付す。
独自の方法的読解によるマルクス主義理論の新しい理解をもって、〈構造主義〉以降の思想の領域を大きく方向づけたアルチュセールの主著。旧訳『甦るマルクス』を全面的に改訳し、未発表論文1篇を付す。
「pour Marx」は「マルクスに捧ぐ」という意味であろう。
Tue Oct 20 00:09:00 2020
[ ISBN-13 : 978-4582760613 ]
