シーズン１
ドラマのシーズン２が始まったので、観ていなかったシーズン１を観ました（アマゾンプライムで）。
私もキャンプが好きで、年に一回は子どもたちと一緒にキャンプをしていました。（去年はできなかった、と思う。多分。もう自信がないけど。多分、コロナのせいで。）
不便
キャンプはかんたんに「非日常」を味わうことができます。それこそが「旅の目的」と言ってもいいでしょう。
だけど、とても不便です。普段、あたりまえに「ある」モノが「ない」からです。逆に、普段「ない」モノが「ある」（大きな自然とかゆっくり流れる時間とか）。だからこそ、非日常が味わえるのですが。[1]
一番、なくて困るのは食料や水ではなくて、トイレですね。食料や水は、持っていくことや調達することもできます。ある程度我慢することもできます。でも、トイレはね。もちろん、キャンプ用（旅行用）の携帯トイレも今はありますが。でも、トイレはなんとなく壁に囲われているところで一人でしないと落ち着きません。多少汚くてもキャンプ場や海水浴場のトイレのほうがマシです。最近のキャンプ場のトイレはとてもきれいです。キャンプ場使用料にはそういった費用も含まれています。電気代、水道代よりも、そういった費用のほうが大きいのではないでしょうか。[2]
女子高生のひとりキャンプ
怖いように思えますね。そして同時に「日本は世界一安全だ」と思ってます。矛盾してますよね。
海外に行けば、たしかに日本より危険な目に合うことは多いような気がします。でも、ちょっと気をつければ大丈夫だとおもいます。知らない人に話しかけられても、全面的には信用しない（親切で声をかけてくれる人もいるけど、頼んでもいないことをされるときは気をつけたほうがいい。基本的には"No thank you"（小泉今日子）です）ことですね。裏通りには入らない。入るときは逃げる場所・方法を確保しておく。そんなアタリマエのことです。
私のような田舎者が東京に行ったときも同じです。悪いことをする人は（そうじゃなくても）「お上（のぼ）りさん」（古い！）ってことはすぐに分かります。裏通りが怖いことは地方都市でも同じです。
でも、非日常というのは危険（つまり知らないという恐怖）が伴います。海辺でキャンプをしていると、海の音がとても大きく聞こえます。風の音も大きく聞こえます。すると、テントが波にさらわれるんじゃないか、とか、風に飛ばされるんじゃないか、とか考えてしまいます（アハハ）。まあ、台風が来ていなければそんなことはないのですが、地元の人は安全と危険をちゃんと感じます。旅行者は知らないのです。
ガイドブックで紹介されているお店に入るのも同じです。ガイドブックが単に出版社の善意で書かれているわけではないことは、わかると思います。そして当たり障りのないお店が紹介されています。ふらっと入った（有名じゃないけど、なんか雰囲気を感じる）店の料理（コーヒーでもいい）が美味しかったら感動しますよね。
安心（安全）を買う
パック旅行では、そんなことを心配する必要がありません。安全、安心を買っているのですから（だから、自分の思い通りにならないと添乗員に文句を言ったりする）。
それなら、旅行になど行かずに、家でテレビを見ていたらいい。家にいたって安全とは限りません。強盗が来るかもしれませんし、隕石が落ちてくるかもしれません。オレオレ詐欺から電話がかかってくるかもしれないし、ネットを開けばウィルスがうじゃうじゃいるし、詐欺サイトに捕まるかもしれない。玄関を出ただけでストーカーが待っているかもしれないのです。そこで、防犯カメラを付けたりします。安全をお金で買っているのです。[3]
スクーター（バイク）、危ないですよね。車も危ない。車やバイクを運転するということは、加害者になる可能性が生まれることです。他の人を被害者にする可能性を生むということです。でも、それを意識することはあまりありません。保険に入っているからいい、くらいでしょうか。加害者になることはないと思っています。そのくせ、宝くじは「当たるかもしれない」と思って買います。交通事故に遭う人と、宝くじで１等が当たる確率を考えればすぐわかることなんですが。
バイクの魅力は、その未完成性です。走っていなければ倒れます。雨が降れば濡れます。でも、風にあたればそんなことはスウ―ッと忘れるくらい気持ちがいいでしょう（私はバイクには乗りません。免許証がないので）。
「可愛い子には旅をさせよ」？
もう死語なのでしょうか。経験というものはつねに行動と結びついているし、行動にはつねに危険がつきまとうのです。なぜなら、未来は不確定だからです。未来は決まっているという人もいますが、決まっているなら全ての行動（行為）は無意味です。寝ていればいい。危険を犯す必要などないのです。[4]
でも、寝ているだけなら死んでると同じですよね（飲み食いしなければ、本当に死にます）。だから、行動しなければならないのです。人間も動物も、植物でさえ、動くこと（行動すること）を強制されて（運命づけられて）いるのです。
生物は、たしかに危険を避ける行動を取ります。でもそれは、個体を存続させるためではありません。「種（しゅ）」を存続させるためです。
私たちは、なんだか個体（個人）が社会を作っていると思いがちです。でも、社会が個体（個人）を作っているのです。「親がなくても子は育つ」と言われますが、それは違います。親がなければ、子は育たないし、生まれもしません（笑）。
そのことを拡張すれば、人間がいなくても自然（環境）は存在しますが（いなかったらそれを確認するのは人間ではありませんが）、自然がなければ人間は存在しないということです。ソクラテスは刑死に際して自分は国家（ポリス）に育てられた、その国家が死刑の判決を下したのだから、私はそれに従う、と言って死にました。そして、ソクラテスが死んでも国家（ポリス）は存続しました。国家を自然に置き換えれば（あるいは親に置き換えれば）、その意味するところは明らかです。[5]
もう少し言えば、「一部」と「全体」（「個別・特殊・具体」と「一般・普遍・抽象」）との関係です。[6]
「一部」が集まって「全体」があるのではありません。机を壊せば木の破片になりますが、木の破片が集まっても机にはなりません。人間の臓器、皮膚等を集めても、人間にはなりません。
全体主義？
何か、こういう言い方をすると「全体」を優先する考えだと思われるかもしれません。そうではないのです。自然から切り離された人間（というか、自然を切離してしまった人間）にとっては、常に自分という肉体におびえて、それとの一体化の回復を考えていたのです（フーコー『快楽の活用』『自己への配慮』『肉の告白』）。だから、（主体的に）行動するとき（行動が行為となるとき）「行い」と「徳」「快楽」との関係を考えることが、古代ギリシャ人にとって必要なことになりました。そしてその問いは答えがない問いなのです。
それではみんなが「哲学」しなけりゃならないのか。そんな事はありません。答えのない問いですからね。考えたい人が考えればいい。あなたが子どもを作らなくても、誰かが作ればいい（人類は存続する）のです（笑）。[7][8]
非日常を買う
もしあなたに自然（あるいは、意味はよくわからないけど「大自然」）に触れたとき、星や月を見たとき、自分を忘れる時間が少しでもあるならその時間を大切にしましょう。お金はそのために使いましょう。[9]
安全・安心はいつまでたっても、どこまで追求してもなくなりません。科学が発達すればするほど、新しい危険が生まれます。「安心」の度合いが高くなるともいえます。
自動車の対人保険の保険金はいくらでしょうか。私は1億円です。人間の価値は1億円で大抵は収まるでしょう、ということですね。でも、もしビル・ゲイツを轢いてしまったら（笑）。年間に数兆円？を稼ぐ人です。多分、賠償金は孫子の代というか私の子孫がず〜っと続いたとしても払いきれないですよね。だからといって、ビル・ゲイツ対策用の保険はないですし、あったとしても、小さな国の国家予算くらいの掛け金になるんじゃないでしょうか。だから、その保険金を払うための保険金に入る。ビル・ゲイツは一人なので、みんながビル・ゲイツ保険に入る必要はないわけです。[10]
安全をお金で買うのではなく、「危険を買う時代」、というか「安全を買わない時代」、「危険を身に受ける」時代なのかもしれません。安全はきりがないですが、危険は限界がありますから。
キャンプ。女子高生のひとりキャンプ。孤島に行くわけでも、山奥に行くわけでもない「ゆるキャン」。いいんじゃないでしょうか。
⟨impressions⟩
Season 1
Season 2 of the drama has begun, so I watched Season 1 (at Amazon Prime), which I hadn't watched.
I also like camping, and once a year I camp with my children. (I think I couldn't do it last year. Maybe. I'm not confident anymore. Maybe because of Corona.)
Inconvenience
Camping is an easy way to experience "unusual". That is the purpose of the trip.
However, it is very inconvenient. This is because there is usually nothing that "is". On the contrary, there are things that are usually "not" (such as big nature or slowly flowing time). That's why you can enjoy the extraordinary. [1]
The biggest problem is not food or water, but the toilet. Food and water can also be taken or procured. You can put up with it to some extent. But the toilet. Of course, there are now portable toilets for camping (travel). However, the toilet is somehow surrounded by walls and I can't settle down unless I'm alone. Even if it is a little dirty, the toilets in the campsite and beach are better. The toilets in recent campsites are very clean. The campsite usage fee includes such costs. I think those costs are higher than the electricity and water costs. [2]
High school girl camp alone
It sounds scary. At the same time, I think "Japan is the safest in the world." It's a contradiction.
When I go abroad, I feel that I often encounter more dangerous eyes than in Japan. But I think it's okay if you take a little care. Even if someone you don't know talks to you, you don't trust them at all (some people are kind and talk to you, but you should be careful when you do something you didn't ask for. Basically, "" No thank you & quot; (Kyoko Koizumi)) That's right. Do not enter the back alley. When entering, secure a place and method to escape. That's Atari Mae.
The same is true when a redneck like me goes to Tokyo. It's easy to see that people who do bad things (even if they don't) are "government-san" (old!). The fear of backstreets is the same in local cities.
But extraordinary is dangerous (that is, the fear of not knowing). When camping at the beach, the sound of the sea can be heard very loudly. The sound of the wind can also be heard loudly. Then, I wonder if the tent will be exposed to the waves or blown by the wind (Ahaha). Well, that wouldn't be the case without a typhoon, but the locals feel safe and dangerous. Travelers don't know.
The same goes for entering the shops introduced in the guidebook. You can see that the guidebook is not just written in the good faith of the publisher. And the bland shops are introduced. You'll be impressed if the food (even coffee) in the restaurant (not famous, but you can feel the atmosphere) is delicious.
Buy peace of mind (safety)
With pack travel, you don't have to worry about that. I'm buying safety and security (so I complain to the tour operator if I don't get what I want).
Then you can watch TV at home instead of going on a trip. It's not always safe to stay home. Robbers may come and meteorites may fall. You may get a call from a scam, you may get a virus when you open the internet, or you may be caught by a scam site. The stalker may be waiting just by leaving the door. Therefore, I attach a security camera. I'm buying safety with money. [3]
Scooter (motorcycle) is dangerous, isn't it? The car is also dangerous. Driving a car or motorcycle creates the potential for perpetrators. It creates the possibility of making others victims. But I don't really think about it. Is it okay because I have insurance? I don't think I'll be the perpetrator. However, I buy the lottery because I think I might win. It's easy to understand if you consider the number of people who will be involved in a traffic accident and the probability of winning the first prize in the lottery.
The appeal of the bike is its integrity. If you are not running, you will fall down. It gets wet when it rains. But when it hits the wind, it feels so good to forget about it (I don't ride a motorcycle, because I don't have a driver's license).
"Let a cute girl travel"?
Is it already a dead language? Experience is always associated with behavior, and behavior is always dangerous. Because the future is uncertain. Some people say that the future is fixed, but if it is fixed, all actions are meaningless. All you have to do is sleep. You don't have to take any risks. [4]
But if you just sleep, it's the same as if you're dead (if you don't eat and drink, you'll really die). That's why you have to act. Humans, animals, and even plants are forced (destined) to move (act).
Organisms do take actions to avoid danger. But that is not to keep the individual alive. This is to keep the "seed" alive.
We tend to think that individuals (individuals) are creating a society. However, society is making individuals (individuals). It is said that a child can grow up without a parent, but that is not the case. Without parents, children wouldn't grow up and wouldn't be born (laughs).
Extending that, nature (environment) exists without humans (though it is not humans who confirm it without humans), but without nature humans do not exist. Socrates died saying that he was raised in a nation (polis) at the time of his death, and that the nation sentenced him to death, and I would obey it. And even if Socrates died, the nation (polis) survived. If you replace the nation naturally (or replace it with a parent), the implications are clear. [5]
To put it a little more, it is the relationship between "partial" and "whole" ("individual / special / concrete" and "general / universal / abstract"). [6]
There is no "whole" when "parts" are gathered. If you break a desk, it becomes a piece of wood, but even if pieces of wood collect, it does not become a desk. Even if you collect human organs, skin, etc., you will not become a human being.
Totalitarianism?
In this way, you might think that the idea is to give priority to the "whole". That is not the case. For a person who was separated from nature (or rather, a person who separated nature), he was always frightened by his own body and was thinking about recovering oneness with it (Foucault "Pleasure Utilization" "Self". Consideration for "" "Confession of meat"). Therefore, it became necessary for the ancient Greeks to think about the relationship between "doing" and "virtue" and "pleasure" when acting (independently) (when the action becomes an act). And that question is an unanswered question.
Then does everyone have to be "philosophy"? That's not the case. It's an unanswered question. The person who wants to think should think. Even if you don't have children, someone can do it (humanity will survive) (laughs). [7] [8]
Buy extraordinary
If you have any time to forget yourself when you come into contact with nature (or "nature", which I don't know what it means), when you see the stars and the moon, cherish that time. Let's spend the money for that. [9]
Safety and security will never disappear, no matter how much we pursue. The more advanced science is, the more new dangers arise. It can be said that the degree of "safety" increases.
How much is the personal insurance for a car? I'm 100 million yen. It means that the value of human beings is 100 million yen, which is usually settled. But if I run over Bill Gates (laughs). Trillions of yen a year? Is a person who earns. Perhaps the compensation cannot be paid even if my descendants continue for a long time. That said, there is no insurance for Bill Gates, and even if it does, it would be as much as the national budget of a small country. Therefore, I will enter the insurance money to pay the insurance money. Bill Gates is alone, so not everyone needs to have Bill Gates insurance. [10]
Instead of buying safety with money, it may be an era of "buying danger," or "an era of not buying safety," or "taking danger." There is no end to safety, but there is a limit to the danger.
camp. High school girl camp alone. "Yurucamp" doesn't go to isolated islands or deep in the mountains. Isn't it okay?
Season 1
Season 2 of the drama has begun, so I watched Season 1 (at Amazon Prime), which I hadn't watched.
I also like camping, and once a year I camp with my children. (I think I couldn't do it last year. Maybe. I'm not confident anymore. Maybe because of Corona.)
Inconvenience
Camping is an easy way to experience "unusual". That is the purpose of the trip.
However, it is very inconvenient. This is because there is usually nothing that "is". On the contrary, there are things that are usually "not" (such as big nature or slowly flowing time). That's why you can enjoy the extraordinary. [1]
The biggest problem is not food or water, but the toilet. Food and water can also be taken or procured. You can put up with it to some extent. But the toilet. Of course, there are now portable toilets for camping (travel). However, the toilet is somehow surrounded by walls and I can't settle down unless I'm alone. Even if it is a little dirty, the toilets in the campsite and beach are better. The toilets in recent campsites are very clean. The campsite usage fee includes such costs. I think those costs are higher than the electricity and water costs. [2]
High school girl camp alone
It sounds scary. At the same time, I think "Japan is the safest in the world." It's a contradiction.
When I go abroad, I feel that I often encounter more dangerous eyes than in Japan. But I think it's okay if you take a little care. Even if someone you don't know talks to you, you don't trust them at all (some people are kind and talk to you, but you should be careful when you do something you didn't ask for. Basically, "" No thank you & quot; (Kyoko Koizumi)) That's right. Do not enter the back alley. When entering, secure a place and method to escape. That's Atari Mae.
The same is true when a redneck like me goes to Tokyo. It's easy to see that people who do bad things (even if they don't) are "government-san" (old!). The fear of backstreets is the same in local cities.
But extraordinary is dangerous (that is, the fear of not knowing). When camping at the beach, the sound of the sea can be heard very loudly. The sound of the wind can also be heard loudly. Then, I wonder if the tent will be exposed to the waves or blown by the wind (Ahaha). Well, that wouldn't be the case without a typhoon, but the locals feel safe and dangerous. Travelers don't know.
The same goes for entering the shops introduced in the guidebook. You can see that the guidebook is not just written in the good faith of the publisher. And the bland shops are introduced. You'll be impressed if the food (even coffee) in the restaurant (not famous, but you can feel the atmosphere) is delicious.
Buy peace of mind (safety)
With pack travel, you don't have to worry about that. I'm buying safety and security (so I complain to the tour operator if I don't get what I want).
Then you can watch TV at home instead of going on a trip. It's not always safe to stay home. Robbers may come and meteorites may fall. You may get a call from a scam, you may get a virus when you open the internet, or you may be caught by a scam site. The stalker may be waiting just by leaving the door. Therefore, I attach a security camera. I'm buying safety with money. [3]
Scooter (motorcycle) is dangerous, isn't it? The car is also dangerous. Driving a car or motorcycle creates the potential for perpetrators. It creates the possibility of making others victims. But I don't really think about it. Is it okay because I have insurance? I don't think I'll be the perpetrator. However, I buy the lottery because I think I might win. It's easy to understand if you consider the number of people who will be involved in a traffic accident and the probability of winning the first prize in the lottery.
The appeal of the bike is its integrity. If you are not running, you will fall down. It gets wet when it rains. But when it hits the wind, it feels so good to forget about it (I don't ride a motorcycle, because I don't have a driver's license).
"Let a cute girl travel"?
Is it already a dead language? Experience is always associated with behavior, and behavior is always dangerous. Because the future is uncertain. Some people say that the future is fixed, but if it is fixed, all actions are meaningless. All you have to do is sleep. You don't have to take any risks. [4]
But if you just sleep, it's the same as if you're dead (if you don't eat and drink, you'll really die). That's why you have to act. Humans, animals, and even plants are forced (destined) to move (act).
Organisms do take actions to avoid danger. But that is not to keep the individual alive. This is to keep the "seed" alive.
We tend to think that individuals (individuals) are creating a society. However, society is making individuals (individuals). It is said that a child can grow up without a parent, but that is not the case. Without parents, children wouldn't grow up and wouldn't be born (laughs).
Extending that, nature (environment) exists without humans (though it is not humans who confirm it without humans), but without nature humans do not exist. Socrates died saying that he was raised in a nation (polis) at the time of his death, and that the nation sentenced him to death, and I would obey it. And even if Socrates died, the nation (polis) survived. If you replace the nation naturally (or replace it with a parent), the implications are clear. [5]
To put it a little more, it is the relationship between "partial" and "whole" ("individual / special / concrete" and "general / universal / abstract"). [6]
There is no "whole" when "parts" are gathered. If you break a desk, it becomes a piece of wood, but even if pieces of wood collect, it does not become a desk. Even if you collect human organs, skin, etc., you will not become a human being.
Totalitarianism?
In this way, you might think that the idea is to give priority to the "whole". That is not the case. For a person who was separated from nature (or rather, a person who separated nature), he was always frightened by his own body and was thinking about recovering oneness with it (Foucault "Pleasure Utilization" "Self". Consideration for "" "Confession of meat"). Therefore, it became necessary for the ancient Greeks to think about the relationship between "doing" and "virtue" and "pleasure" when acting (independently) (when the action becomes an act). And that question is an unanswered question.
Then does everyone have to be "philosophy"? That's not the case. It's an unanswered question. The person who wants to think should think. Even if you don't have children, someone can do it (humanity will survive) (laughs). [7] [8]
Buy extraordinary
If you have any time to forget yourself when you come into contact with nature (or "nature", which I don't know what it means), when you see the stars and the moon, cherish that time. Let's spend the money for that. [9]
Safety and security will never disappear, no matter how much we pursue. The more advanced science is, the more new dangers arise. It can be said that the degree of "safety" increases.
How much is the personal insurance for a car? I'm 100 million yen. It means that the value of human beings is 100 million yen, which is usually settled. But if I run over Bill Gates (laughs). Trillions of yen a year? Is a person who earns. Perhaps the compensation cannot be paid even if my descendants continue for a long time. That said, there is no insurance for Bill Gates, and even if it does, it would be as much as the national budget of a small country. Therefore, I will enter the insurance money to pay the insurance money. Bill Gates is alone, so not everyone needs to have Bill Gates insurance. [10]
Instead of buying safety with money, it may be an era of "buying danger," or "an era of not buying safety," or "taking danger." There is no end to safety, but there is a limit to the danger.
camp. High school girl camp alone. "Yurucamp" doesn't go to isolated islands or deep in the mountains. Isn't it okay?
[キャスト・スタッフ等]
監督：二宮崇 吉野主 玉澤恭平
プロデューサー：藤野慎也 熊谷喜一 岩倉達哉
原作：あｆろ 『ゆるキャン△』（芳文社）
脚本：北川亜矢子
音楽：小田切大
主題歌：LONGMAN 『Replay』
オープニングテーマ：H△G 『瞬きもせずに』
＜出演＞
福原遥：志摩リン
大原優乃：各務原なでしこ
田辺桃子：大垣千明
箭内夢菜：犬山あおい
志田彩良：斉藤恵那
柳ゆり菜：各務原桜
土村芳：鳥羽美波
＜ゲスト出演＞
見方あゆ実（第4,6,7話） 両羽桃夏（第4話） ベガ山本（第5話） ニクまろ（第5話） 伊原農（第6話） 北原帆夏（第7話） ヒロシ（第8,11話） 野口雄介（第9話） 山本映子（第9話） 半田美樹（第9話） 猪俣三四郎（第10話） ＜声のゲスト出演＞
ヒロシ（第3話）
キャンプの魅力とキャンプを満喫する女子高校生たちのゆるやかな日常を描いた、新感覚ゆるゆる系キャンプドラマ!
ストーリー
ソロキャンプが趣味の女子高生、志摩リン(福原遥)は、今日もひとりでキャンプへ向かう。
本栖湖の浩庵キャンプ場へとやってきたリンは、湖畔にテントをテキパキ準備し始める。
まったりと一人の時間を過ごすリンはトイレへ向かうと、富士山を見に来て迷子になった女子高生、各務原なでしこ(大原優乃)から助けを求められる。
戸惑うリンだったが、お腹が減ったというなでしこのためにカレー麺を用意することに。
二人で焚き火を囲みながら他愛もない会話をしていると、目の前にはある光景が…
ストーリー
ソロキャンプが趣味の女子高生、志摩リン(福原遥)は、今日もひとりでキャンプへ向かう。
本栖湖の浩庵キャンプ場へとやってきたリンは、湖畔にテントをテキパキ準備し始める。
まったりと一人の時間を過ごすリンはトイレへ向かうと、富士山を見に来て迷子になった女子高生、各務原なでしこ(大原優乃)から助けを求められる。
戸惑うリンだったが、お腹が減ったというなでしこのためにカレー麺を用意することに。
二人で焚き火を囲みながら他愛もない会話をしていると、目の前にはある光景が…
[1] 「あたりまえにある」というのは間違いかもしれませ。妻が毎日苦労して、そのあたりまえを造っているんですよね。私は昭和の人間です。(^_^;)
[2] 蛾が飛んでいたり、ムカデが歩いているとなんとなく落ち着きません（笑）。私は虫が嫌いです。小さい頃は虫と遊んでいたのに。
[3] お金をかければ安全なのか、安全はお金で買えるものなのか、防犯カメラ（＝監視カメラ）は自分の安全のために、他人の安全（プライバシー）を犯していないか、などの問題はあります。新型コロナウィルスのために消毒液を無尽蔵に使うことが他の生物にどのような影響があるのか。石鹸の界面活性剤の影響はなぜ語られなくなったのか。近代化の歴史は、安全（危険の排除）の歴史でもあります。泥棒に入られることの回避は泥棒へ不利益を与えます。（笑）
[4] 中学で習う科学や、高校で勉強する物理は『過去』も『未来』も物理法則で決まっていることになっています。でも、その決定性は不確定性原理や不完全性定理でゆらぎつつあります。でも、そんなことが問題なのではなく、法則化（抽象化）の可能性そのもののことを言っています。
[5] ソクラテスは「国家」を考えました。当時のアテネ人にとっては国家と一体化すること、市民であることが人生の目標でした。それは自然との一体化のポリス的表現でした。「全体主義」とは全く関係ありません。
[6] この話がプラトンのイデア論と密接に関係していることは、お気づきのことかと思います。西洋哲学史はその「肥大した自我」との戦いの歴史です。
[7] じゃあ、いまのままでいいんでしょうか。多分、いいんでしょう。「・・・すべき」というのが、私は嫌いです。でも、このままじゃ環境が取り返しのつかないことになる、人類は存続できないと言われています。
[8] 確かめたわけじゃないです。私には確かめようがありません。私にわかるのは、自分がニコチン中毒であり、不眠症であり、発泡酒（第3のビール）がまずいということであり、私にはお金がないということくらいです。
[9] 自分を忘れることは日常的にあります。例えば映画やテレビを見ているとき、ゲームをしているとき、自分を忘れてはいませんか。私だけかな。そう考えると、私は人生の殆どの時間を自分を忘れていることに費やしている気がします。
[10] もっと簡単なのは、ビル・ゲイツがいなくなることです。(^_^;)
TV
ドラマ
青春
部活・サークル・生徒会・集団活動
日本 Color
2020/01/09 ～ 2020/03/26 | 木曜日 | 25:00～25:30 | テレビ東京
[拡大] 
