時間は、さわることも手に取ることもできない、漠然とした存在（？）である。私たちの感覚としては、時間を科学的に、つまり一方向に向かう直線上のものとしてとらえている。それに対して、哲学的な考察の試みをしたのがこの本である。
内容は、わかりやすいとはいえない。学者というのはこんなことも一所懸命考えているのだなあと感心してしまう。
彼自身の考えは最終章にまとめられている。ものの意味を「その物が単にその物としてあるのではなく、何か他の物として値し、機能し、通用するその仕方のこと」と定義している。それは時間のみならずすべてのこと、すべての認識に通用する。価値論としてみれば、自分の価値を他の物で表現するということである。「主観にとって或る意味が本当に意味であるのは、当の主観が、その意味を身に蒙る形で生きるのでなければならない」「意味がそれに伴って存立する本当の超越論的主観は身体でなければならない」「主観であると同時に客観である物、言いかえれば能動性と受動性の両契機を兼ね備えたもの、それが身体だ」という身体論もおもしろい。しかし、主観と客観、心と体の関係はしっかりと整理しなければならない。その上で、心と体の統一としての身体、あるいは別の面から見た身体としての受動性と能動性を述べるべきである。
Wed Apr 17 07:48:42 2002
⟨impressions⟩
Time is a vague existence (?) That cannot be touched or picked up. Our sense is that time is scientifically viewed as a straight line in one direction. On the other hand, this book is an attempt of philosophical consideration.
The content is not easy to understand. I'm impressed that scholars are thinking hard about this.
His own thoughts are summarized in the final chapter. It defines the meaning of a thing as "a way in which the thing deserves, functions, and works as something else, not just as that thing." It applies to all things, not just time, but all perceptions. In terms of value theory, it means expressing one's own value with something else. "For a subjectivity, a certain meaning really means that the subjectivity must live in a way that bears that meaning." "The true transcendental subjectivity that the meaning exists with it is the body. The body theory that "must be" "things that are both subjective and objective, in other words, things that have both active and passive momentum, that is the body" is also interesting. However, the relationship between subjectivity and objectiveness and mind and body must be well organized. On top of that, we should state the passiveness and activeness of the body as a unity of mind and body, or as a body from another perspective.
Wed Apr 17 07:48:42 2002
Time is a vague existence (?) That cannot be touched or picked up. Our sense is that time is scientifically viewed as a straight line in one direction. On the other hand, this book is an attempt of philosophical consideration.
The content is not easy to understand. I'm impressed that scholars are thinking hard about this.
His own thoughts are summarized in the final chapter. It defines the meaning of a thing as "a way in which the thing deserves, functions, and works as something else, not just as that thing." It applies to all things, not just time, but all perceptions. In terms of value theory, it means expressing one's own value with something else. "For a subjectivity, a certain meaning really means that the subjectivity must live in a way that bears that meaning." "The true transcendental subjectivity that the meaning exists with it is the body. The body theory that "must be" "things that are both subjective and objective, in other words, things that have both active and passive momentum, that is the body" is also interesting. However, the relationship between subjectivity and objectiveness and mind and body must be well organized. On top of that, we should state the passiveness and activeness of the body as a unity of mind and body, or as a body from another perspective.
Wed Apr 17 07:48:42 2002
[拡大] [ ISBN-13 : 978-4004120346 ]
