前に読んだときはとてもおもしろかったのに、今回はとても不満だ。生産主義と労働至上主義との関連はいいが、それがなぜ労働の喜びの否定になるのか。なぜ労働の廃棄は不可能なのか。労苦としての労働の廃棄はあるのではないか。なぜ３時間であれば労苦としての労働がなくなるのか。それは、労働に快楽が内在しているというのと変わらないのではないか。
問題は、視点である。人間は、太古から必要な活動をしてきた。（それが「労働」と呼ばれようと呼ばれないとしても。）アルカイックな労働に対する視点は、そのような労働を見ることになる（同一視するのは危険であるが）。それを「労働」と呼んだとたんに近代の視線が入り込む。それに、古代ギリシャの視線が入り込む。階級制度の視点である。近代の労働観は、決して古代ギリシャからの労働をさげすむ感覚を克服して労働至上主義になったのではない。近代労働に対する反作用として生じたものであり、かつやむを得ずその感覚を持たなければ生きていけない現実がある。それらは共存している。それは、自営農業者と工場労働者では位置が異なるが共存しているのだ。
アルカイックな目、古代ギリシャの目、資本家の目、農業労働者の目、工場労働者の目、それらの視点を整理しなければならない。その整理ができなければ可能性は開けない。
ラファルグの目は、それらを見通している。フーリエもしかり。それは、ある意味で当時の状況のなせる技であるが、日本においても戦前、いやつい最近までそのような目を持っている人が近代の労働観とは違う目を持って日々暮らしていたのだ。
今村の目は、都会（都市ではない）の目である。
Tue Apr 09 07:30:48 2002
⟨impressions⟩
It was very interesting when I read it before, but this time I am very dissatisfied. The connection between producerism and labor supremacy is good, but why is it a denial of labor joy? Why is it impossible to dispose of labor? Isn't there abandonment of labor as labor? Why does labor as a labor disappear if it is 3 hours? Isn't it the same as the fact that pleasure is inherent in labor?
The problem is the viewpoint. Humans have been doing necessary activities since ancient times. (Even if it is not called "labor".) The perspective on archaic labor is to look at such labor (although it is dangerous to equate it). As soon as I called it "labor", the modern gaze came in. In addition, the line of sight of ancient Greece enters. This is the perspective of the class system. The modern view of labor has never become a labor supremacy by overcoming the sense of despising labor from ancient Greece. It was a reaction to modern labor, and there is a reality that we cannot live without that feeling. They coexist. That is, self-employed farmers and factory workers have different positions but coexist.
The eyes of archaic eyes, the eyes of ancient Greece, the eyes of capitalists, the eyes of agricultural workers, the eyes of factory workers, and their perspectives must be organized. If you can't organize it, you can't open up the possibilities.
Rafarg's eyes are looking at them. Fourier too. In a sense, it is a technique that can be done in the situation at that time, but even in Japan before the war, until recently, people with such eyes lived every day with eyes different from the modern view of labor. It is.
Imamura's eyes are the eyes of the city (not the city).
Tue Apr 09 07:30:48 2002
It was very interesting when I read it before, but this time I am very dissatisfied. The connection between producerism and labor supremacy is good, but why is it a denial of labor joy? Why is it impossible to dispose of labor? Isn't there abandonment of labor as labor? Why does labor as a labor disappear if it is 3 hours? Isn't it the same as the fact that pleasure is inherent in labor?
The problem is the viewpoint. Humans have been doing necessary activities since ancient times. (Even if it is not called "labor".) The perspective on archaic labor is to look at such labor (although it is dangerous to equate it). As soon as I called it "labor", the modern gaze came in. In addition, the line of sight of ancient Greece enters. This is the perspective of the class system. The modern view of labor has never become a labor supremacy by overcoming the sense of despising labor from ancient Greece. It was a reaction to modern labor, and there is a reality that we cannot live without that feeling. They coexist. That is, self-employed farmers and factory workers have different positions but coexist.
The eyes of archaic eyes, the eyes of ancient Greece, the eyes of capitalists, the eyes of agricultural workers, the eyes of factory workers, and their perspectives must be organized. If you can't organize it, you can't open up the possibilities.
Rafarg's eyes are looking at them. Fourier too. In a sense, it is a technique that can be done in the situation at that time, but even in Japan before the war, until recently, people with such eyes lived every day with eyes different from the modern view of labor. It is.
Imamura's eyes are the eyes of the city (not the city).
Tue Apr 09 07:30:48 2002
一日のかなりの時間をわれわれは労働に費やす。近代以降、労働には喜びが内在し、働くことが人間の本質であると考えられてきた。しかし、労働の喜びとは他者から承認されたいという欲望が充足されるときである。承認を求める欲望は人間を熾烈な競争へと駆り立てる。労働中心主義文明からの転換を、近代の労働観の検討から提起する。
[ ISBN-13 : 978-4004305842 ]
