I thought it would be interesting in the newspaper review, but I finally bought it (Mercari ¥ 570, shipping included).
It was very interesting. I read it in about 2 hours. There were many books I didn't know at all, and about half of them knew the "correct answer".
But that "interesting" seems to have my own "intellectual superiority". It's arrogant. What does it mean to know the "name of the book"? You don't have to know the title. The important thing is to "read".
Library work
In the library, " Library Lord ”(written by Umiharu Shinohara) was interesting. The contents of the book are also described in detail in "The Lord of the Library". This book ("1 million times ...") barely touches on the contents of the book. Writing the content (synopsis) always includes the interpretation of the person who wrote it, so I may have avoided it. I think I should be in the position of a library staff.
The work of library staff seems to be difficult. But I think it's rewarding.
I think that's exactly what "the library is a fort of democracy" (P.184). Kohei Saito said, " As I wrote in "Capital Theory" ", the library is . "Democratic" without "common" is nothing more than "a group of conflicting ". "Weak meat and strong food" and "social darwinism" will be infested there. In other words, it is a "new liberalism" society.
Now, let's go to please (trouble?) The library staff.